Posts Tagged ‘Animation’

Toying around is serious business

Sunday, June 27th, 2010

Toy Story 3 - Lotso Huggin' Bear

A poster from the "Meet the characters" series

Toy Story 3 is a triumph for Pixar in so many ways: overcoming sequel-itis, thwarting the evil empire, and simply maintaining an unbroken string of hits – which is a lot easier said than done.

Andy is all grown up, and Woody, Buzz and the gang find themselves looking forward to either a life of retirement in the attic, or the threat of being thrown away. Instead, they’re accidentally donated to a kids’ centre where they find a new lease on life with an endless supply of kids to play with them, but all is not as well as it seems…

I found the movie to be a lot closer to the original than Toy Story 2, which is to say that I rank this one higher (but the original is still the best of course). This third and final instalment in the series does what it has always done exceptionally well, which is to combine imagination and the sense of wonder with an emotional core based in reality (unlike that other franchise, which presents vapid parables of adult issues dressed in kids’ fairy tale clothing). Only a person with the coldest heart would be unmoved at the conclusion of the movie.

The cast of Toy Story 3

The core cast of the Toy Story series

The plot of Toy Story 3 is not only entertaining in and of itself, but provides a most satisfying conclusion to the trilogy. Like everything about the series’ contrivance that allows toys to come to life when we humans are not looking, the resolution is neat, plausible and leaves nothing to be desired.

By the way, don’t waste your money on 3D for this one. It was not specifically designed for it, not does it add much to the experience, unless you really love the novelty of it, and aren’t troubled by the encumbrance of the glasses and the dimness that they cause.

And so we bid a sad, but fitting farewell to Woody and the gang (at least until they release the trilogy on blu-ray…)

—-

* Huh, I discovered that “integrous” – the adjectival form of “integrity” – is actually a neologism, one of those non-words that entered the lexicon through common usage rather than a respectable etymological history. Ah, the perils of an ever-evolving language.

Bookmark and Share

Shrek Forever After

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010
Shrek Forever After

The final showdown

Cast aside your doubts: the fourth and final chapter in the series isn’t too bad, although I must admit I may be slightly influenced by the fact that I got my tickets for free through work (I probably wouldn’t have watched it otherwise). It’s also mercifully short, with Shrek dealing with the consequences of signing a magical contract with Rumpelstiltskin and dealing with his domestic problems, all in a brisk 93 minutes.

The contract grants Shrek one day where he can return to being a real ogre, loathed and feared by the humans, and in exchange, the trickster Rumpelstiltskin takes one day from Shrek’s past. Naturally, there’s a built in gotcha, and the day that “Rumpel” takes is the day on which Shrek was born, thereby changing everything – Shrek never rescues Fiona, and her parents sign the rights to the land of Far Far Away over to the trickster in the misplaced hope that he could help save their daughter.

You could say that Forever After is a reboot of sorts. Shrek starts out alone all over again, and the movie loses all of the excess baggage accumulated through the earlier sequels. Other favourites like Donkey and Puss-in-Boots are also given clean slates, so that even the occasional rehashed joke felt fresh again.

But it’s not all good news. The original Shrek kicked off the franchise as a kids movie with adult smarts – the inverse fairytale of the ugly ogre who turns out to be the hero – but as the series progressed, the grown-up humour and story elements encroached further and further, until the point where we now have an adult movie that has the occasional amusing bit for kids. It’s still presented as a kids movie (especially with the pointless, gimmicky 3D), but the main theme deals with Shrek’s mid-life crisis, and there’s a scene where sexy witches dance to Beasty Boys music in a pseudo nightclub. Riiiiiiight.

Dreamworks just doesn’t get it. The original Shrek was charming and original, but Shrek 2 and Shrek the Third proved that they had no idea why, by dishing up smarm dressed up as charm. In spite of the above gripes though, I enjoyed this chapter more than the previous two because this time around I didn’t feel so much like as if the movie was watching me back with a smug grin, constantly digging me with its elbows going “Geddit? Geddit?”

And there’s no arguing with free.

Bookmark and Share

Up

Saturday, September 19th, 2009
Disney Pixar's Up movie wallpaper

Disney Pixar's Up movie wallpaper

I was very sceptical about Up when I first read the premise for it a few years ago: a movie about an old man who decides to flee his life by floating away in a house attached to thousands of balloons? Bleh. I remained unconvinced throughout the trailers, although by then a number of reviews had started trickling out, all glowing. Then I watched it, and the opening sequence punched me so hard the guts that I spent the rest of the movie recovering.

Carl and Russell, house in tow

Carl and Russell, house in tow

Pixar makes creating brilliant, heartfelt movies seem so effortless. Think about it: they’ve made people around the world sympathise with rats, have feelings for a garbage collecting robot, laugh at the monsters hiding in kids’ closests, and now they’re asking us to fall in love with Carl Fedriksen, a grumpy 78-year old man. Pixar’s secret, as Director Peter Docter reveals in an interview, comes from the advice that the late Disney veteran Joe Grant gave to him, which is that every story must be set on top of an “emotional bedrock”. That echoes the sentiments of Walt Disney, who once said “for every laugh, there should be a tear”. Considering the number of tears that Jenny shed, this is one heck of a funny movie. Me? I er, had a cold, which is why I was sniffling throughout the movie – yeah, that was it…

We saw it in 3D, paid the 3D movie tax, and received yet another pair of glasses that I’m loathe to throw away because of the wastefulness of it – there are no recycling bins for them at the Macquarie cinemas. The effect was well used, not to show things coming in and out of the screen as a lot of 3D features tend to do, but to provide depth or closeness as the emotional tone of the scene required*. Pixar doesn’t rely on gimmicks, smarts or cynicism to build a bridge with the audience, instead creating real and honest characters that you can’t help but empathise with. Like Miyazaki, they’re masters of observation as much as anything else, and you can really see parallels with reality in every animation sequence, from facial expressions to the way fog moves across the landscape. The dogs are especially hilarious, and there are a lot of little dog-jokes dotted throughout. (A little joke tip for you just in case: dogs are colour-blind.)

Russell

Russell

One thing that annoyed me though, was the voice of Russell, performed by Jordan Nagai. It can’t have been easy working with a 7-year old kid, as he was at the time (described in this interview – warning: contains spoilers) but Pixar were trying to go for youthful innocence, and I guess this is just another example of how far they’re willing to go for authenticity. Most of the time it sounded like he was reading the script, which is fair enough considering that this is his first movie voice-acting role: the story goes that he tagged along to his brother’s audition for the role of Russell, and the casting crew asked him to audition. Even though he’s never acted before he managed to endear himself enough to score the part. How jealous would the brother be!

That aside, I found the storyline to be just plausible enough, and definitely more than entertaining enough, to allow suspension of disbelief. It’s easy to criticise the physics of it if you could be bothered, but it really is incidental to the evolution of the characters. Unlike Ponyo, where the setting was just another character to be observed, the relationship between Carl and Russell takes the spotlight here, and the background remains exactly that (albeit a very beautiful one).

Pixar went to great lengths to make Up kid-friendly such as making sure that nobody dies when falling from great heights (rot13: rira gur ivyynva’f qrngu vf nzovthbhf, nf ur’f ynfg frra ubyqvat n srj onyybbaf nf ur cyhatrf qbja gb rnegu, qvfnccrnevat oruvaq gur pybhqf), but things do get quite stressful at times, if not especially scary, with one child asking to leave.

But yay! we finally got to see Pixar’s latest. It’s been out in America since May, and while there’s often a delay, we had to wait a whole 4 extra months!? The rumour going around is that the distributor wanted the run to co-incide with a school holiday, but that still doesn’t explain the staggered release dates: it was released on the 3rd in Queensland and Victoria, the 10th in South and Western Australia, and New South Wales last of all on the 17th (not sure about the rest).

Go and see it before the school holiday rush. Bring tissues.

—-

* There’s a great little featurette about this on the official site.

Bookmark and Share