Posts Tagged ‘Action’

Tomorrow, When The War Began (Part 2: the movie)

Monday, August 30th, 2010
Tomorrow, When The War Began poster

This could be anywhere really, couldn't it?

This review is a continuation of Tomorrow, When The War Began (Part 1: the book).

Tomorrow, When The War Began is a welcome change in direction for Australian movies. After the glory days of Australian cinema with iconic titles such as Mad Max, Crocodile Dundee, and Picnic At Hanging Rock, the industry seemed to spiral into a mire of navel gazing, self-indulgent, and boring films (with the rare exception, such as Kenny) This led to a palpable tension between film makers, who were fighting for their integrity in trying to tell uniquely Australian stories, vs. the critics who were arguing that audiences were becoming disillusioned with local movies that may have artistic merit but aren’t popular and bomb at the box office. Hence the hope is that this big budget production (purportedly $20 million) heralds the beginning of a renaissance in locally-produced cinema.

For that reason, Tomorrow has a very clean, “Hollywood” feel to it; the actors look shiny (glossy, even) and glamorous, and besides Chris’s long drawl during his little monologue, the cast’s accents are fairly neutral (at least to my Aussie-tuned ears anyway – international audiences may very well feel strongly otherwise). Ellie, Homer, Corrie, Kevin, Lee, Fi, Robyn and Chris are all competently rendered by their aptly chosen actors, but what I found disappointing – in spite of what I said above – was that the most important character of all was missing: Australia. The story could almost have been set in a small rural town of any country. Because the script attempted to cram as much of the book’s action into the 103 minute running time as possible, there was precious little time for lingering shots of the beautiful Australian outback, or scenes showing the laid-back, rustic lifestyle of the residents of Wirrawee.

The cast of Tomorrow, When The War Began

From left: Lee, Fi, Homer, Ellie, Corrie, Kevin and Robyn

The script is an exacting adaptation of the novel, never quite rising to the level of its source material, and not bold enough to take more than the most trivial liberties to make the story better fit the medium. There’s even a line in the movie where Ellie says that movies are never as good as the book, which didn’t really seem like a joke so much as the writers’ self awareness of the quality of their effort. One particularly low point was a cringe-inducing moment between Ellie and Lee at Chris’s house: the pair are sitting at the window, and Ellie has these few strands of hair in front of her face that she inexplicably neglects, allowing Lee to come in with the stinker “I always used to look forward to geography class” before brushing it aside and kissing her.

Because the script followed the book oh-so-faithfully, there was zero tension for me as I knew exactly what was going to happen next. Jenny quite enjoyed it though, and constantly joined in with the cinema’s refrain of gasps during the pivotal scenes. Maybe if I had watched it with fresh eyes like her I would have enjoyed it much more. Hopefully it does well and brings about a revival of great Aussie movie productions.

Bookmark and Share

God of War 3

Sunday, August 22nd, 2010
God of War 3

Kratos is one angry dude...

A quickie review of God of War 3 to finish off the week. This game probably deserves slightly more verbiage than I’m willing to dedicate to it, but suffice to say that there are many ardent supporters of this ground-breaking series (often literally) that blends together 3D action platform gaming, excessive violence and Greek mythology.

The game borrows heavily, but largely successfully, from other genres: there are bits of Shadow of the Collossus, Street Fighter, and even bits of Echochrome, all seamlessly integrated into the overall narrative structure. This game closes off the the storyline from the previous games, which sees the “Ghost of Sparta” exacting revenge on the Olympian gods for causing him to accidentally kill his own family.

The plot is driven along by crappy, but mercifully sparse, dialogue and finishes with a climax that leans quite heavily on existentialist claptrap. But the point of the God of War series was never the story; it’s about dishing out retribution with extreme prejudice, and in that sense the game delivers in spades. In this final instalment Kratos is not content with  taking down monsters and gods, but also Titans of such immense proportions that they form entire game levels by themselves.

By the way, was it just me, or did the lyrics for the Ominous Latin Chanting in the final battle sound a lot like “Kratos, Kratos, Kratos, ha ha ha…”?

Bookmark and Share

Date Night

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010
Date Night movie poster 1

This is similar to the poster that I saw. I would have expected a much different movie...

Talk about going in there with no expectations: last night my wife suggested we go watch a movie, and although I generally keep to the big blockbusters, I didn’t really feel like How to train your dragon or Alice in Wonderland (not to mention baulking at the thought of having to pay the 3D tax). Jenny said that she’d heard good things about Date Night, starring Steve Carell and Tina Fey so we decided to watch that.

Now, the only thing – the one, single lonesome thing – that I’d seen, heard or read about date night was a big cardboard cutout at the cinema, showing Carell and Fey looking… slightly dishevelled. Therefore I assumed that it was going to be your usual rom-com fare. Boy was I wrong.

Date Night movie poster

... if I had seen this poster instead.

The first few scenes setting up the Foster family were as expected: the couple about to be bored to death by their marriage, their friends supposedly finding freedom by breaking up leading to a lot of introspective navel gazing, couple starts to do wild and wacky things to compensate, culminating in an epic battle of the sexes. Ha ha. Except that’s not what happened at all. Instead, at about 10 minutes in, the script took a sharp turn, stepped hard on the accelerator, and sent the couple on a wild ride (both literally and metaphorically) through the seedy parts of New York.

Date Night is still identifiably a product of Hollywood – glaring product placements, characters cut out from blatantly clichéd ethnic, socio-economic and cultural stereotypes – and yet it manages to hit all the right notes. Carrell and Fey were absolutely brilliant in their roles as Phil and Clara Foster, with just the right look and demeanour to pull off the “ordinary folk stuck in an extraordinary situation” schtick. Shawn Levy, the director, is the very model of restraint – a quality which is sadly becoming quite rare in this genre – pulling back on the throttle at just the right moment before a joke goes from hilarious to cringey. Overall, the movie couldn’t be further from the “slices of bread holding together a shit sandwich” that “I Watch Stuff” predicted it would be when the movie was first announced.

I also liked that Date Night was completely lacking in cynicism. The conservative in me rejoices that every relationship (bar the one that triggered the plot in the first place) has a happy resolution: people are generally portrayed as being worthy human beings, if maybe a bit quirky or eccentric; the Fosters work through their marriage troubles in a positive and constructive way, instead of being narky to each other and having to come to an emotional stalemate in order to get through the trials, only to have their differences and problems magically disappear by the end of the movie; and the bad guys get their comeuppance in ways that don’t involve moral compromise, wanton death and destruction, or wilful negligence.

Maybe it was just the novelty – for once – of not knowing, but I doubt that I could be this entertained by every movie for which I have zero expectation. If you’ve already seen Date Night, did you know anything about it beforehand, and if so what did you think?

Bookmark and Share

Holmes, Holmes on the range

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson

Sherlock Holmes movie poster

Sherlock Holmes, starring Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law, is one of the recent crop of sexed up literary classics such as The Picture of Dorian Gray, and Tim Burton’s upcoming Alice in Wonderland. This movie is surely conceived for the current generation, with its slow-motion flashbacks accompanied by a narration of how-it-works; you could be forgiven for thinking that this is a new CSI: Ye Olde England.

Director Guy Ritchie has delivered us a quick-thinking, fast-talking, and hard-hitting Holmes. Without having actually read the books, I’d hazard a guess that they’ve made a valiant effort to retain the spirit of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s work, but have sadly taken the liberty of emphasising the characters’ physical prowess as much as their intellectual capabilities. Regardless, Holmes solves mysteries by being a superlative detective, with or without biffo, and I found the movie to be agreeable, with Downey Jr. an inoffensive Holmes, and Jude Law playing the affable but beleaguered Watson perfectly.

However, there were two things that really, truly irked me in Sherlock Holmes, although they weren’t problems with the movie, per se:

1. The blatant declaration of franchise
It seems that a Hollywood movie wont’ be bankrolled these days unless it’s a sequel, or could potentially spawn sequels. When was the last time you saw a movie whose title doesn’t contain a numeral (deliberate attempts to avoid this, such as The Dark Knight notwithstanding)? Sherlock Holmes brings this to a new low, by incorporating Holmes’ arch-nemesis Professor Moriarty into the plot right from the get-go, but not resolving that particular part of the storyline.

2. It’s all about America
In the middle of the movie, the film’s antagonist Lord Blackwood delivers his monologue about the fruits of his nefarious plan, about how the “new colonies” are weak from civil war, how their government is just as crappy as the British one, and how by taking over both he will rule the world. It’s as if everything that happens up until then doesn’t matter, but once their precious country is threatened, that’s the moment when the penny drops and the duh-merican thinks to themselves “hoo boy, that’s why his ass needs a-whuppin’!”

Why is it that America is always depicted as “the world”? It’s as if the average citizen can’t fathom how a foreign person could conceivably do significant evil to the world if it’s not a threat to the U.S. of A. Take Quentin Taratino’s Inglourious Basterds – they even had to insinuate themselves into history of Nazi Germany. Sadly, I’m sure that if pressed, they would just retort that America makes movies for America, and if you don’t like it go and make your own… except that they ripped off Sherlock Holmes from the British. Oh well, I’m sure the irony is lost on Hollywood. At least they have the decency to make their movies entertaining, unlike Australian ones.

Bookmark and Share